# A grandmother's name that a toddler invented

> MIMI was never chosen by an adult — it's a grandchild's failed attempt at Margaret that the whole family quietly adopted and never corrected.

August 19, 2026 · https://justog.club/stories/grandparent-name-they-chose

MIMI, in huge charcoal hand-painted capitals across the chest. Underneath, much smaller, MARGARET —
her real name — with one red line struck through it.

Nobody sat down and chose MIMI. A grandchild who couldn't yet say Margaret said something close
enough, and within a year every adult in the house was saying it back — a different kind of
[grandparents' gift built from a photograph](/stories/grandparents-gift-photo) starts with
somebody choosing the image; nobody here chose anything.

## Why is she called MIMI instead of her actual name?

Because a specific child, at a specific age, tried to say Margaret and couldn't manage it, and the
version that came out stuck.

Nobody corrected her. That's the part people forget: the easiest thing in the world would have been
for the adults to keep saying Margaret until the child caught up, the way they would with any other
word a toddler mangled. Instead the whole room changed its own vocabulary to match a two-year-old's
mistake, and kept it up long after the child in question learned to talk properly. Fifty years on,
strangers at the school gate and her own son both call her the same invented word.

## Why print MARGARET at all, struck through, instead of leaving the shirt at just MIMI?

Because MIMI alone reads as a nickname somebody picked. Struck-through MARGARET proves it wasn't.

A nickname implies a decision — a diminutive somebody landed on because it was warmer or shorter,
closer to [a single word picked on purpose to carry a whole shirt](/stories/one-word-shirt).
This isn't that. The struck line is evidence: a real name that got overwritten by accident, by one
small mouth, before anyone had the chance to object. Remove MARGARET and the shirt just states a
pet name. Leave it, crossed out, and the shirt is a record of the exact moment the substitution
happened and never got reversed.

## Is there a correct set of names a family should use for its grandparents?

No. Every family's set is a local accident, produced by whichever grandchild spoke first and
whatever came out of their mouth that year.

Some houses land on a real word from another language a great-grandparent spoke. Some land on
nothing more dramatic than a lisped first syllable that never got finished. None of it is designed
and none of it needs to resemble anybody else's — it's the same accident of repetition behind
[a word a household made up for an object with no other name](/stories/the-word-only-this-house-uses),
except this one was pinned on a person rather than a thing, and nobody in the room chose it on
purpose. What matters is whether it's what your family actually says out loud — not what sounds
proper on a card.

### When two grandmothers end up needing names that sound alike

It happens more than families expect: two invented names arriving in the same rough shape, because
toddlers tend to fail at "Grandma" in similar ways. Families usually settle it by letting a second
detail ride along — a surname initial, a place, a habit — so the two names stop colliding in
conversation. That second detail is worth keeping on the shirt if it's the one your family actually
uses; leaving it off to keep the design cleaner just reintroduces the confusion it solved.

## Who has the right to put a family's invented name on a shirt?

Nobody outside the family has any claim on it — there's no company or estate holding a name a
two-year-old made up. The person with a real stake is the grandmother herself.

Asking her first is not a legal formality here; it's just the honest version of the question. A
name applied to somebody without their agreement is a different object than a name they were happy
to see printed, even when the words on the shirt are identical.

## What if she'd rather her real name wasn't shown, even crossed out?

That's hers to decide, and it goes both ways. Some grandmothers would frame this shirt; some would
rather MARGARET stayed private, even struck through.

There's no way to guess which from the outside, and guessing wrong is the actual mistake here, not
the design itself. A version with just MIMI, full chest, no struck line underneath, carries the same
idea without putting her given name on display — worth having ready if that's the answer she gives.

## Does it print well?

Yes. Hand-painted capitals hold their shape at chest size, and one thin struck line survives at any
size that keeps MARGARET legible underneath.

Charcoal on ochre gives enough contrast for the small line without needing a third ink, which is
the same discipline behind [a short colour count holding up better on fabric](/stories/limited-palette-prints-better).
The red strike is a single stroke, not a fine underline, so it won't fill in or vanish the way a
hairline rule can on washed cotton. Two inks for the names, one for the strike, is the whole print.

## How do I get one made?

Describe the name at [JustOG](/) — the real name, the invented one, and who first said it wrong.

Pick a direction, drag the crop frame, see it composited on the real garment, and it's made to
order and shipped.

Designs other people have published are in the [shop](/shop).

Somewhere there's a woman who has answered to a toddler's mistake for half a century and stopped
noticing it was ever anything else.