Three attempts at the same sentence, each one shorter
The same request written three times, in three different pens, gets shorter each time until only two words survive legibly on the page.

A torn half-sheet, three lines stacked close together. Same message, three different pens.
Each line is shorter than the one above it. The first two are a scribble nobody could read back.
The third, in different ink again, is plain: STILL WAITING.
What are the three lines actually recording?
Three separate attempts to ask for the same thing, written on three separate occasions.
A single note asks once. Three lines in three pens means the sheet was picked back up more than once, over however long it took, each time to write essentially the same request again because the first two hadn't landed. It's the same kind of arrangement that starts life as a docket handed over in good faith — this is what the sheet looks like once that arrangement has stopped working.
Why does each line get shorter than the one before it?
Because writing a polite version of the same request takes more effort than writing a short one, and that effort runs out.
A first attempt tends to explain, soften, add context. By the second, the explaining has already been done and doesn't need repeating. By the third, there's nothing left to add — just the fact of still waiting, stated as plainly as it can be. The shortening isn't the message getting angrier. It's the message getting more efficient, because everything except the fact itself has already been said, twice, already.
Why is only the last line legible?
Because the earlier versions of the sentence don't matter any more, and the drawing treats them that way.
Whatever careful wording went into the first attempt did its job at the time and then stopped mattering the moment a second attempt was needed. Leaving those lines as an unreadable scribble keeps the design accurate about what's actually left to say — two words, stated once, clearly, because by that point clarity was the only thing left to try.
What does three different pens tell you that three lines alone wouldn't?
That this happened on three separate occasions, not in one sitting.
A single pen writing three lines could be one attempt at drafting a note before sending it. Three visibly different pens means the sheet was returned to more than once, kept somewhere between attempts rather than written and sent all at once. The pens are a timestamp with no date on it — proof of a gap, without saying how long the gap was.
Can I put my own version of this note on a shirt?
Yes — three lines of handwriting in different pens is a format, not anybody's specific document.
Nobody owns the idea of chasing the same request more than once on the same sheet. What belongs to somebody is a particular real note — an actual person's actual words, to an actual recipient — and reproducing that specific document is a different thing from writing your own version of the same shape. Your own three attempts, on your own sheet, are the version that's actually yours.
Does this only apply to money owed by a shop?
No — the same shape fits any request that had to be repeated because the first ask didn't land.
A returned item, a promised reply, a favour agreed to and then forgotten: anything chased more than once, with the wording getting shorter each time, uses this design the same way. Waiting on a cheque that's already been sent is a slower, quieter version of the same problem — here, the wait has gone on long enough that somebody's writing about it instead.
What happens after the third line doesn't work either?
Usually nothing dramatic — the debt gets written off, and whatever stock was riding on it goes back into storage rather than getting chased any further.
Three attempts is already more than most people make. A fourth would cost more time than the amount at stake is worth recovering, and at that point it's cheaper to stop asking. The unsold copies that never came back sometimes end up boxed instead — the note and the box are two different endings to the same kind of arrangement.
Does it print well?
Yes, and the contrast between the scribble and the clean line is the whole design.
The first two lines work best as a dense illegible scrawl in a flat single tone, while STILL WAITING needs to stay crisp and legible against it — a contrast a fine weave can hold even when the
scribble above it can't. Slate, charcoal or another dark plain ground keeps the three-pen effect
readable as three distinct tones without needing colour to do it.
How do I get one made?
Describe the note at JustOG — how many attempts, and what the last line finally says. Pick a direction, drag the crop frame, see it composited on the real garment, and it's made to order and shipped.
Designs other people have published are in the shop.
Nobody wrote a fourth line. Two words were the last thing left to try.